On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 22:03 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 28/04/10 23:52, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:39 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
On 28/04/10 23:32, Aleksis Jauntēvs wrote:
Hello,
The idea is to implement package signing for Arch similar to rpm GPG package signing.
Good to see someone interested in this.
Yes, the monthly forum threads were a bit tiring.
I wonder what the need would be like for testers. And what testers would actually do (try and break stuff?).
The need for testers usually occurs after implementation! :)
Well, it does seem like a multi-part project, so I'm sure even before a total implementation there would be bits and pieces to test (functionality in pacman, for example, that nobody would use because the rest of the supporting cast isn't there yet).
Hello I also like the idea of package signing for Arch. It would really be great if someone could implement this. I would also update my system to testing just because of this development, if a new pacman version containing this feature would show up.