31 Jan
2010
31 Jan
'10
5:14 p.m.
Le Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:01:15 +0000, Ananda Samaddar <ananda.samaddar@vfemail.net> a écrit :
After some discussion we should be able to reach a consensus and start giving security issues the priority they deserve.
Maybe this is the problem: some people (including me) might think that perfect security is not a priority. The people from Debian see it this way: security > functionnality > simplicity I see it the other way around: simplicity > functionnality > simplicity Meaning: I prefer something that is simple and insecure. I am OK with more security if it doesn't make Arch tools overly complex. Otherwise, because Arch is a desktop (as opposed to server) distribution, it is just not worth it. -- catwell