On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:59:54 -0400 Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
On 08/11/2012 09:30 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
[putolin]
I think there is no interest (upstream) in trying to make systemd optional forever, so this is a concern you are probably right about. However, the suggestions of what might be merged show that you are either joking or don't know these projects well. At some point parts of dbus will move into the kernel (so that is something to troll about I guess). -t
One thing that the folks/upstream that are merging all these things together is missing is that the future of "user" computer is moving to phones and ipad type devices. PC will still be around but the consumer has spoken and it looks like he/she is moving to these devices. I don't condemn them for doing so as they want something that works. Turn it on and get what they want done, PCs don't do this.
Smartphones, tablets and i* devices are toys. Have you ever tried to compile Android/openWebOS? Or openwrt for a router? Or even ArchlinuxARM? They is not nearly as flexible as PCs. Sure, if all you need from a computer is a means for posting crap on facebook, then consumers are right. Just because these mobile/embedded devices are hyped doesn't mean they own the future. Besides, systemd, PA, dbus are quite natural for embedded devices. For instance, Palm has been using PA in their devices since first versions, and quite successfully.
How are/would these giant concoctions going to play here as they don't have the storage, memory, or cpu to handle this. The direction should be going in the tool kit style as in here's the kernel and you can bolt on all of these independent things. Something like android?
Mobile phones like samsung galaxies have dual core Cortex A10 (?) and LG Tmobile GX (at least in the US) runs on quadcore Nvidia tegra. That's more processing power than my previous laptop. -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D