26 Mar
2011
26 Mar
'11
12:34 a.m.
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Milos Negovanovic < milos.negovanovic@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Cédric Girard wrote:
No. But what I understood from what Thomas said is: as you need to reboot your server anyway from time to time to apply security updates, you may decide to switch to an even more often updated kernel, if your architecture permit it (reboot != service interruption).
For most people running arch on their servers reboot == service interruption
Am I wrong here?
As I stated in my previous mail, you may have a resilient architecture with a failover for your services. Howerver I can easily understand how this may sound unrealistic in a home server context. -- Cédric Girard