2 Jan
2016
2 Jan
'16
8:39 p.m.
On 01/02/2016 03:32 PM, Ben Oliver wrote:
On 2 January 2016 at 20:17, Kyle Terrien <kyleterrien@gmail.com> wrote:
This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package.
Agree - AUR. Arch should follow upstream - if there is a spin off alternative with this disenagaged (HigherFox or whatever) ... we can certainly choose a different package - but Arch should stick with the upstream version. Aside: I don't use firefox - but curious - how would one test developer versions of extensions then? Or is this no longer possible in firefox?