[2012-11-15 11:35:06 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
On 15 Nov 2012 10:15, "Gaetan Bisson" <bisson@archlinux.org> wrote:
[2012-11-15 09:23:43 +0000] Leonidas Spyropoulos:
And written permission should be the emails, thus I believe we are fine.
Written permission should be a legally binding document. An email stating the personal opinion of somebody who is neither a lawyer nor official representative of the copyright holder (the company) has no legal value.
Of course nobody cares; people just want to throw more and more binary blobs in [community] because it's cool and the AUR is for losers...
Fair enough I can understand that, so having it in the AUR instead will save us from all that discussion since it's not binary, it's just a link for fetching and unzipping it, right?
Roughly yes: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository Use the AUR - you will love it. I don't know when people started thinking the AUR wasn't good enough for their packages anymore... -- Gaetan