On Aug 2, 2011 6:39 PM, "C Anthony Risinger" <anthony@xtfx.me> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Tobias Powalowski <tobias.powalowski@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi guys, please signoff 3.0 series for both arches.
Upstream changes: http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
Archlinux Changes: - Rename the package kernel26 -> linux - Added replaces everywhere - Removed old comments and vercmps from .install file - Removed old comments and replaces from PKGBUILD - added compatibility symlinks for vmlinuz26 and initramfs filenames in PKGBUILD, in order to not break bootloader entries. - removed System.map file, not needed anymore we provide /proc/kallsyms
Now stuff to discuss before uploading to testing: - kernel name: vmlinuz-linux - initramfs name: initramfs-linux.img same for fallback of course.
both look good here -- x86_64 + i686
------------------------------
... out of curiosity, if the original reason for having a `kernel26` package was to also have a `kernel24` (from what i read -- wasn't around then) how is this handled with the `linux` package? or is this a non-issue?
C Anthony
I think that nobody has kernel24 in their system, so this isn't an issue. -- Kwpolska Sent from my phone.