I've installed ArchLinux on 3 desktops so far, and I've done them successfully, so I must have *RTFM* , I was just wondering why is it hard to configure wifi. Since I failed to configure wifi with wpa_supplicant. I'll try with wifi-menu today, and report progress. No need to be so aggressive man. On 07/24/2017 01:48 PM, Robert Wong via arch-general wrote:
A general Arch installation is nothing but a minimal set of GNU/Linux system with a package manager, which can be configured into anything. I'm not going any further for you have made yourself clear that you haven't done your research. Offensive as it can be, I'd say *RTFM*.
PS: It's apparently navie to say sth like Arch is nothing but a desktop for archlinux.org itself runs on Arch Linux.
RW
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO From: Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general To: arch-general@archlinux.org CC: Junayeed Ahnaf
All fine and good but I don't see arch being installed on something other than desktop/laptop. Of course there are niche cases as arch server I do not doubt but how much of arch install base is traditional desktop? I think it's rather high.
On 07/24/2017 01:30 PM, ITwrx.org wrote:
On 07/24/2017 12:30 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote:
Why is there no NetworkManager in ArchISO? Arch Linux is not like desktop focused distributions. Therefore, it's ISO does not come with "everything but the kitchen sink" where you have a turn-key desktop after running a GUI installer or install script. It has the base set of software you need to assemble what you need for your given install target.
Isn't it widely accepted as the go to method of connecting to internet in Linux? No, not in general like that. Network manager is primarily used for network management with desktop environments, most commonly Gnome, as the other respondent noted. Arch Linux is used in many different ways, not only for the desktop.
Is there any reason for it not to be default? The defaults for the ISO would generally be the simpler options, and less likely to be something large with a lot of dependencies. Also, minimalist ISOs were the norm rather than the exception in years past and for Reasons. They still are in some cases or with some distros. Also, there are not always application defaults with Arch Linux like you might have with a desktop distro. Arch is "DIY/build your own and choose your own defaults (for the most part)" type of distro.