Allan McRae wrote:
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List
Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the DeveloperWiki?
Allan
Good job.
And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed packages [#2] are now "any"
[#1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt
I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle.
Allan
No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this list and list of current packages. I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense, Good Luck! -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D