Am Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:51:15 +0200 (CEST) schrieb okraits@arcor.de:
this is simply not true.
Sorry, but this is simply true. I know Windoze XP and I had to use it long enough, far too long.
First of all, starting with Windows XP the stability of Windows (yes, Windows, not Windoze) got much better and there are very few crashes which are mostly related to driver issues, IMO.
Much better? Slightly better! And, yes, Windoze.
Secondly, Windows doesn't need to be reinstalled every 3 months. Come on, most companies use Windows on their desktops and they don't need to reinstall them every 3 months. And their employees actually can work with their computers.
I used Windoze long enough. And I had to reinstall it every 3 months, and I know a lot of people who also had to do it this often. Since Windoze XP it was maybe not every 3 months anymore, but still often enough.
And i don't say this because i like Windows but because i'm realistic and not unfair. I don't live in a world where one system is perfect and the others are all completely crap. If you think that Windows is completely bad then you're not professional.
I am realistic and professional, because I speak from experience, like I said before more than 25 years. Windoze is completely bad. Otherwise I wouldn't get fits of raving madness every time I have to work with this crap, which is fortunately not too often anymore.
BTW: pacman.conf is written in an ini-style as well.
Not really. Heiko