On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:01 PM, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
On 07/09/2012 10:52 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Check the ArchLinux ARM forum:
http://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3036&p=18467
where filesystem upgrade is suggested:
pacman -Syuf
But, I'd wait until someone confirms it is the right way to go.
Thank you Mateusz!
We will wait for the all clear from the devs before forcing. Arch Devs, when you can confirm a force is the proper way to handle this util-linux issue, please let us know. I'm just trying to avoid causing myself grief :)
One strange thing is that the files generating the conflict are owned by the shadow package. I don't remember of any warning about forcing updates for util-linux in arch-devel. It seems to me like a packaging bug. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? For more information, please read: http://idallen.com/topposting.html ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto Linux user #524555 -------------------------------------------