On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:31, Peter Lewis <pete@muddygoat.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 at 10:16 Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:03, Peter Lewis <pete@muddygoat.org> wrote:
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 at 14:30 Magnus Therning wrote:
Anyone out there using Prism successfully on Arch 64bit?
After reading this thread I just took a look - I hadn't heard of it before.
It seems the PKGBUILD pulls in an i686 binary (there's a complementary bin32-version).
Is there a reason why it's not a source package?
This is where the confusion may be. I'm using the Firefox extension[1].
Ah, I haven't tried that.
I decided to try that mostly because the only pre-built versions were 32-bit, and AUR didn't have a build-from-source package, just as you noticed ;-) I also liked the idea of a FF extension on a matter of principles; why install XulRunner for Prism when I already have a perfectly working XulRunner for FF already? Anyway, I can report that the FF Prism Extension works equally well on a 32-bit Ubuntu system I have access to :-( The only system were it works as expected is a WinXP system I have here :-( I wonder if there's something in the FF build in Arch (and Ubuntu) that prevents it from working properly. I'll report more after I've tried the Mozilla build of FF. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe