Hi, our current default wireless framework in base /e/rc.d/network script is iwconfig (Open/WEP only). I like to integrate wpa_supplicant as easy as we could use iwconfig ATM. iwconfig is a useless framework in most user environments in these days (most AP's have a stronger encryption than WEP'), but it is a "easy" tool. Two possibilities: a) Throw away iwconfig(wireless-tools package) from rc.d/network and use wap_supplicant only. wpa_supplicant could of course do all the things iwconfig is for. b) Let the user decide wihich wireless framework. This could be done by seperate /e/conf.d/wireless from wireless_tools and add therin config options for each iwconfig and wpa_supplicant. Ex.: -------------------- #wlan_eth0="iw|eth0 mode managed essid default" #wlan_wlan0="wpas|<wpa_supp options -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf>" #WLAN_INTERFACES=(eth0 wlan0) ------------------------- So /e/rc.d/network->wi_up() has to be modified to honor also wpa_supplicant. For both ways /e/wpa_supplicant.conf should get modified to a cleaner default config (Most comments and examples). We should provide a config file with activated entries for OPEN wlan and WEP connections (User has to modify WEP essid and key), and also a deactivated entry for common WPA2/PSK wlan(User has to modify and activate this for his/her needs). The advantage of using wpa_supplicant at least in addition to iwconfig is IMHO the easy and straightforward integration in our network settings (r.conf and conf.d/wireless). No need for extra packages like Netcfg, wicd, networkmanager to associate to WPA infrastructure (but could be used by users if they want their "funcionality""). What do you think about? Regards Gerhard "gerbra"