On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 31/05/10 13:23, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan<lists@itech7.com>wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr. <jeffrey.parke@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan<lists@itech7.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Matthew Monaco<dgbaley27@verizon.net> wrote: > > On 05/30/2010 10:53 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In order to improve firefox's reponse time, I'm thinking of >> compiling >> firefox with gcc's -O3 and -march settings from the ABS. >> Any tips on that matter, about updates, etc. ? >> > > Try firefox-pgo. You have to be careful with gcc options when
compiling
> > firefox. The AUR's firefox-pgo sets up properly for you. >
It seems firefox-pgo is for 64bit, but I am on 32bit. I had put up a thread about upgrading to 64bit, but many suggested that it would not improve the performance much :( Should I compile after upgrading ?
it should be for both 32 and 64 bit
Hmm, I think so, the compilation should fail if not :) What's about firefox-qt ? Is it worth installing it ?
that's a firefox port for the qt toolkit, as opposed to the regular gtk one.
I know that, but is it worth installing ?
Surely you can decide yourself.
I heard that firefox-qt is still under heavy development and is not much good. I am on a slow connection, so would like a feedback if someone is already using it. -- Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: nilesh.gr Twitter: nileshgr Website: www.itech7.com