13 Aug
2012
13 Aug
'12
12:41 a.m.
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:33:17 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@alice-dsl.net> wrote:
The essence of it still is the question, why can't PA be optional?
PA isn't needed. PA can be an advantage for some usages. PA can completely break some Linux.
What specific problem do you have with programs being linked to libpulse, so far I haven't encountered any in Arch. OK, I also know from supporting software that some other distributions have a long standing tradition of trampling Jack under their feet and being more or less permanently useless for years already. One reason I'm very happy to be using Archlinux...! --- Joakim