On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:43:03 +0200 Tom Gundersen wrote:
I couldn't find a reference. Do you have a link? As far as I'm aware, the only real complaint against udisks2 is that they don't supply commandline tools with a stable API. However, the dbus api is stable, so it would be trivial for a third party to provide commandline wrappers aronud the dbus stuff, which could then be considered stable. Is this what he is doing?
Sorry, yeah
"http://igurublog.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/spacefm-udev/"
I sent it straight after realising I'd left it out but it doesn't seem to have come through yet, ahh wrong from address sorry.
So he is reimplementing large parts of udisks because he didn't like that the command line tools does not have a stable api... or did I miss something? Why not just use the dbus api? -t