On Mon 28 Jun 2010 09:13 -0500, Victor Lowther wrote:
On Jun 28, 2010, at 8:59 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon 28 Jun 2010 08:04 -0500, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Caleb Cushing <xenoterracide@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Victor Lowther <victor.lowther@gmail.com> wrote:
Questions, comments, flames, etc. welcome.
why go this way instead of the other? (clarification why go deeper into bash instead of trying to posix-ify the scripts)
Because we are never going to eliminate arrays from rc.conf.
Well, it may still be beneficial to some. The scripts could be used with a different style rc.conf in other environments.
Then it will not be Arch.
Depends on what you define as Arch. I've heard that Arch is what you make of it. Hehe. I don't know if you could disqualify it from a difference of one file.