7 Nov
2010
7 Nov
'10
11:14 p.m.
On 07.11.2010 18:39, Florian Pritz wrote:
It doesn't seem like dcron is maintained very well [1], so I think we should consider switching. FS#18681 [2] is quite a critical bug in a crond when everyone expects jobs to run only once.
I'd like to go with fcron because it seems to work very well for most people, has a lot of features while having a small dependency tree.
Comments welcome.
[1] http://repo.or.cz/w/dcron.git [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18681
+1 I was bitten by that bug quite badly and it spawned 20+ backup jobs.