On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@exys.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@exys.org> wrote:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to the next iteration.
Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts
my sentence was stating exactly that, condensed and in inverse order. i was saying, i will post my fixed packages, which i manage downstream anyway.
Let me know if this bugformat works for you:
Looks ok to me. Thanks.