Re: [arch-general] Why was wpa_supplicant.conf renamed wpa_supplicant.conf.pacsav??

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 02:25:00PM -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:

I know this is small-potatoes stuff, but I just wonder if in these instances, it may not be better to either provide pre-update notice or do a post-install script rather than relying on a post update action by the user? At least in the cases where you know up-front that existing functionality will be disabled by the upgrade. (which was apparent from the comment)

Hmm, what about reading /var/log/pacman.log? Cheers, -- Leonid Isaev