Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Pacman 4.0.0 RC1 "release"

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 17:40, Allan McRae wrote:

On 22/08/11 03:10, Myra Nelson wrote:

...

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae  wrote:

...

On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:

...

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee    wrote:

...

For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):

* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz * pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz

Allan, Dave, and I (and probably a few others) run pacman-git on most of our systems with no problems, so their should be no real shockers or problems if you give this a spin. There are no database upgrades or changes this time so downgrading later should work fine if truly necessary.

What we're looking for feedback on:

* any build failures in makepkg you may see * if you manage a custom repo, how does repo-add work for you * does pacman behave as it did before * if you want to sign packages, does the functionality in makepkg and the documentation make sense * same for signing repos- does it work for you

What we know isn't there yet: * translations * a developer keyring (or keyring package)- if you delve into this, you will need to look at pacman-key for now * great error messages on verification failure, or ability to import keys on the fly if it is unknown

Note that we'd love testing even if you don't plan on touching any of the new signing stuff- there were 500+ commits worth of changes in this release, including a switch to curl as the download library, so anything out of the ordinary should be reported. Please choose -git as the version in the bugtracker if you do it that way, otherwise email pacman-dev.

Happy testing!

-Dan

This may not be in the right place but I just experienced an error while upgrading. This is the first hiccup I've noticed since installing the pacman-4.0.0.rc1. I put a copy of the pacman log for the last two days and the error messages I'm receiving here: http://pastebin.com/WsCJPpqk .

This is a sample of the error, :: File /var/cache/pacman/pkg/avahi-0.6.30-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz is corrupted (invalid or corrupted package (PGP signature)). It was the same for device-mapper, eject, fakeroot, and lvm2.

I tried changing mirrors from rit.edu to mirrors1.kernel.org and resyncing with pacman -Syy. I still received the same errors. Other packages upgraded just fine, inetutils; net-tools; atool. Since I'm not familiar enough with the pacman code I'm not sure where to go next. If I need to file a bug report I will be glad to.

Use --debug to get more detailed error messages.

Basically, signatures are now being included in our repo databases.  You do not have them in your pacman keyring so pacman can not validate the package.  Read the man pages for pacman-key and pacman.conf to find out more on how to configure your system to deal with this.

You can get developer keys from: http://www.archlinux.org/developers/

Allan

Works like a charm. Thanks again for the assistance. I missed  #GPGDir  = /etc/pacman.d/gnupg/ in the new pacman.conf file or I would have investigated further. I only had one other problem, importing Andreas Radke's key. I get a key not found error both when I click the link on the developers page and when I try to import the key with pacman-key.

You can get it from: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Signing_Packages/Packager...

Allan

Thank you again. Sorry to be such a pia. That took care of the gnutls update and I bookmarked the page. Myra -- Life's fun when your sick and psychotic!