Re: [arch-general] no python3 package?

On 07/10/10 14:40, Angus wrote:

I'm glad Arch did the python3 transition and I agree with python3 being the default version (i.e. having 'python' symlink to 'python3.x').

But what's the reason for no longer having a package named 'python3' with a symlink to 'python3.x'? It would make (/have made) the transition a little easier, no? Any harm done in providing it?

I have no idea what you are talking about...

pacman -Ss python3 testing/python 3.1.2-2 [installed] Next generation of the python high-level scripting language community/python3 3.1.2-4 Next generation of the python high-level scripting language

Note that testing/python will replace the community/python3 once it moves to [extra]. Allan