On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan <lists@itech7.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila <vodoo0904@sonnenkinder.org> wrote:
At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads. other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one.
+100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-)
To be clear:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm going to give this the rest of the day to simmer down, then I'm going to start moderating/banning accounts
Notice that "accounts" is the plural, not the singular.
Err. I don't think you should do that unless they become a pure nuisance. I am facing a similar situation with Squidoo. Because of someone else on my subnet (I have static ip), spamming on their site (or may be due to a virus, its a common scene here), they have banned the whole subnet. And now even after several request they won't whitelist me. You may end up banning some for none of their mistake.
Moderating an account merely puts emails from that account on hold until approved by a moderator.