On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif <schiv@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin <drankinatty@suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I have been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it here on the Arch wiki, or do you want it over on the Trinity wiki?"
It doesn't matter to me. It makes more sense to have it here, but there has been so much rancor over 'kde3 is dead' that I don't want to go to the effort here if somebody is just going to nix it.
For the interested, Trinity is no longer kde3. It is currently actively developed, and is moving to cmake and qt4. There are current builds for Debian, Ubuntu and Slackware being maintained. My goal is to create a set of pkgbuilds for Arch (which will obviously take a bit of time). But if I can get them working from the svn tree, it should be a great resource for Arch.
So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or at Trinity?
The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not?
Yes! wiki it up!
kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That's how Arch works, after all. So yes, I think putting Trinity on the wiki is fine, and it should/will only get nixed if it stops getting maintained.