I think the name should be simple (I've already commented on AST). But I wanted to point out, the name isn't everything. Its what the team does or proposes to do that should be thought about. Spending too much time on a name, while not actually doing anything is fail. -Miah On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 3:18 PM, J. McBlane <toolman33@gmail.com> wrote:
Arch Security Enhancement Team? Securing Arch For Everyone? Arch Guard?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 08:46:59PM +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
On to the first order of business. As the subject says, what should security team be called. Hopefully we can get a few suggestions and then reach a consensus. Arch Linux Security Task Force just sounds like too much of a mouthful to me.
I was brooding over this and I thought some sort of acronym that's an actual word would sound better, so I came up with this:
'Arch Response Team for Security' or ARTS. It's a bit cheesy and cheats a bit to get the acronym but is instantly memorable. I'm aware arts was also a KDE technology but it has long since been deprecated.
Ideas?
Ananda