Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@gmx.net> wrote:
Aaron Griffin a écrit :
2009/10/5 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s@gmail.com>:
Btw, if someone interested in, here is the list of packages which failed last time:
<snip>
texlive-bibtexextra texlive-bibtexextra-doc texlive-core texlive-core-doc texlive-fontsextra-doc texlive-formatsextra-doc texlive-games-doc texlive-genericextra-doc texlive-htmlxml-doc texlive-humanities-doc texlive-langcjk-doc texlive-langcyrillic-doc texlive-langextra-doc texlive-langgreek-doc texlive-latex3-doc texlive-latexextra-doc texlive-music-doc texlive-pictures-doc texlive-plainextra-doc texlive-pstricks-doc texlive-publishers-doc texlive-science-doc thunderbird-spell-i18n
<snip>
These are PKGBUILD errors. Additionally, it looks like someone has
someone = me :) see further below
removed old verisons as only the latest seem to exist here: ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/
Please take this up with the individual maintainers or file a bug report or something
I don't know about the texlive-*-doc packages from community, which are maintained by Stefan Hussman. Feel free to ask him directly or to file a bug report.
In the case of the texlive packages in extra, I always upload the sources to ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/other/texlive/ and usually leave the source tarball for at least the last two versions. It does happen that I forget, however, and Eric usually reminds me quickly ;)
I think keeping the tarballs for the last two versions is sane, but if someone thinks otherwise, I can leave them available for a longer period. Opinion on this?
Now, more spefically: * texlive-core : sources are up-to-date, so probably your ABS tree was not in sync. * texlive-bibtexextra : the latest source tarball was indeed missing, fixed now!
It's also possible that the -doc packages are farther behind, and sources have been removed for those simply because they're not up to speed with the official texlive packages
Hello, the -doc packages are far behind because I did not manage to build them correctly, i.e to download the doc packages in a similar way Firmicus does for the normal packages. I did not upload the zip-files to ftp.archlinux.org because I do not see a reason for doing so and the packages are quite big. No user probably wants to update a the packages that way or will be able to do so. Regards Stefan Husmann