On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 12:43 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jayesh Badwaik <jayesh.badwaik90@gmail.com> wrote:
With respect to daemons, the BEFORE and AFTER in the service files is redundant and though not likely to cause errors, likely to be inconsistent, because for every service file where a daemon "xyz" appears in AFTER, the corresponding daemon must appear in BEFORE in the service file for xyz. I am not quiet sure why this redundancy is there, you can simply have just "AFTER" variables and they should take care of all the dependencies I guess.
This is certainly not true – it is enough for /one/ unit to have Before or After.
Sorry, what kind of new logic philosophy/math do users need to learn? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic Pardon, I only know the German Wiki, since my English is broken.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy
By the way, I, for one, am increasingly annoyed by (not only) your style of discussion. Not that it'd matter in any way, but I miss the times of productive and helpful threads on this list.
HTH, Dennis
I don't claim to be an expert, I already mentioned that I'm a dummy. So again: Is Linux in the future for experts only?