On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 00:31 +0100, Xavier Chantry wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Giovanni Scafora <giovanni@archlinux.org> wrote:
Il 26/03/2010 00:02, Ng Oon-Ee ha scritto:
Repository : extra Name : gsfonts Version : 1.0.7pre44-1 Installed : 8.11-5 URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gs-fonts/
I'm assuming this is a simple mess upstream on non-consecutive version numbers? The linked sourceforge page still lists 8.11 as the stable version, while the one currently in extra is listed as 'pre' (and doesn't seem available in the sourceforge page?
I guess that maintainer forgotten the force option. svn log message says "Use newer version of the fonts as provided by Fedora's package urw-fonts Fixes FS#10593"
It's indeed all well explained in the two comments of that bug : http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10593#comment59554
Oh! I thought the bug number was Fedora's bug tracker.... my bad. Explains very well.