But heiko makes a point. If an unsupported package still worked, without compiling or something like that, why would you drop it? The idea with a new "unsupported" repo is not bad. You have got the binaries, but you are also saying: "this program will probably not work. We take no responsibility" "Ng Oon-Ee" <ngoonee@gmail.com> schrieb:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 16:47 +0100, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 16:37:41 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
If some says "this is shame", "I'm leaving", "you suck", "developers are selfish", you could certainly discard them, but not I or Heiko, we just talk about our opinion. Does a great community contain only TU/devs? Does Arch is driven by them alone? If you think so what a upstream developer will think you are? A tester.
I lol-ed.
And Gan Lu, I'm not sure which thread you've been following, but Heiko specifically references something along the lines of "I may as well go back to Gentoo".
In the end this just sounds like "I'm going to whine because MY packages got deprecated". Repeatedly I see unfounded statements like 'popular and important packages'. Something like firefox or gcc is popular and important. The rest is niche. If the devs want to maintain them, fine, there's rules for that. If not, just go and compile it. It moves the burden of work to the person who cares about the package (which is obviously not the dev).
-- This message has been sent from my android phone with k-9 mail