On 9 September 2014 12:25, lolilolicon <lolilolicon@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Guillaume ALAUX <guillaume@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hello,
Guillaume here (packager of that "piece of crap" java-common).
Yes it is pretty crappy.
symlinks created by the jre* packages at install time, without any package tracking them.
Yes, that is the point of script archlinux-java [3].
It's crappy mainly because of the whole bunch of symlinks being *untracked*.
Also, this has been publicly discussed back in May [5] where very few people cared to give feedback.
Sorry I don't follow every discussion on the mailing list... I would never have joined one about java, really; it just so happens this one is so *wrong*...
To be sure, I do appreciate your effort, Guillaume. No one likes to deal with this java crap. I don't have strong objections against your general approach, only this particular packaging practice. Let's improve it.
To be sure, I do appreciate your effort The vocabulary you use to describe this package prevents you from stating that you "appreciate" my effort. Please, read again this thread and reconsider your language. I am open to criticism if it is done in a polite way.