On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:23:33PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
So it's only needs twice the time with only on third of the ticks? Well that is awesome... Yeah to systemd!
systemd is much more complicated, and requires many more tricks.
Please remember: I hate systemd. I have seen systemd boot faster than rough equivalents. Yes, the software is a huge, bloated piece of crap. But it is also unmistakably capable of faster boot times when services are started properly in parallel. That's assuming a few things (like that your services are not hugely inter-dependent or that a couple [like, maybe DHCP, depending on your server] just take stupidly long to start up). For all its faults, being incapabel of giving you a boot time advantage is _not_ one of them.