Re: [arch-general] `base` group replaced by mandatory `base` package - manual intervention required

On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:36 PM Eli Schwartz via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org> wrote:

But regardless, we very explicitly wanted to *not* use the name "base" for recommendations, because it does not make clear that it is in fact recommendations.

So the choices were either get rid of the base group and make a base package, or also get rid of the base group, but make a package named something entirely differently. There is no option on the table for there to continue to be a confusing group named "base".

(...) Some changes were always inevitable.

Ok, I'm convinced. p.s.: nano is _fine_.