On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Piyush P Kurur <ppk@cse.iitk.ac.in> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:57:02PM +0800, Auguste Pop wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk@gmail.com> wrote:
by gmail, do you mean the gmail web interface or the gmail mail service?
The threading is done by the mail client and has nothing to do with the mail protocol SMTP/IMAP etc.
i am using the web interface, and has the behavior you depicted for gmail. if i use a "real" and "proper" mail client, would it be better?
So in this case the mistake is that of gmail webclient. Because:
Have a discussion with someone on say "Bugs in the code". Now if your mailer justs looks at subjects to thread then two different mails with subjects "Bugs in the code" (and their subsequent replies) will be clubbed which is clearly undesirable.
A real mailer a la mutt for example will thread mails based of message id's and this will solve this otherwise problem of mind reading. What is assumed is a bit of consideration from the replier. A new message should be started as a new message not as a reply to an old message with a changed subject.
Regards
ppk
thank you for the explanation. i noticed some inconsistency between my mail inbox and the mailing list's archive. i now know the reason. :-D