1 Apr
2009
1 Apr
'09
11 a.m.
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 10:28 +0200, Thomas Bohn wrote:
On Wed, April 1, 2009 10:09, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
This was posted in march. And it's discussed on the developer mailing list and voted for. Personally I also agree they made a good choice.
Okay, what is the alternative? Especially if you don't want end up with Debian-based distributions?
a more obvious choice would be to stick with archlinux+ABS, remember we're just dropping BINARY package support, arch's build tools will remain the same, think of it as a less sucky gentoo. cheers..
Thomas