31 Mar
2008
31 Mar
'08
10:29 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Roman Kyrylych <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
2008/4/1, Loui <louipc.ist@gmail.com>:
Do we need a GPL1 and GPL1+?
Seems like we would need a GPL1. GPL1+ is logically the same as GPL since there are no previous versions (are there?)
I haven't seen a single piece of code licensed under GPLv1 ever. :-)
Ok. How about this. Lets assume "GPL" means 1.0 and up. Problem solved because it will... *ahem, let me clear my throat* never ever ever ever ever ever happen.