On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> wrote:
On 2014-05-06 08:45, Marcel Korpel wrote:
update-desktop-database -q […] Have you bothered finding out what that command actually does? Once you do, you'd see that it's useless in this case.
Ah, it's only necessary to update the MIME cache, so files with a certain extension are automatically loaded within a certain application? Sorry, I don't use a desktop environment, so I didn't know what the behaviour was.
$ pacman -Qo gtk-update-icon-cache /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache is owned by gtk-update-icon-cache 2.24.23-1
So shouldn't those packages with an icon theme depend on gtk-update-icon-cache instead of just on hicolor-icon-theme? eclipse depends on gtk2, which depends on gtk-update-icon-cache, which depends on hicolor-icon-theme. The deps are already satisfied, which is why namcap didn't complain.
So, about eclipse: it isn't necessary, but in general: the Wiki should say that gtk-update-icon-cache should be included as a dependency (if it isn't satisfied by something else) instead of hicolor-icon-theme, which doesn't provide gtk-update-icon-cache. Am I right?
Is the Eclipse package wrong or is the Wiki not complete (also note that the recommended install file of gedit [4] isn't that complete: it doesn't contain a call to gtk-update-icon-cache as it doesn't contain a hicolor icon theme; perhaps we should look for another example)? If it doesn't install an icon, there's obviously no need to call gtk-update-icon-cache.
No, of course not, but the Wiki says: "The gedit package contains a very generic install file". However, the gedit install file isn't as generic as claimed: it isn't targeted at updating the icon cache. Regards, Marcel