Re: [arch-general] openssl 3 -- status?

On 7/1/22 07:13, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote: anks for bringing that up David.

I am wondering if some folks might be leaning toward libressl, which at

Nope - Seems the original api/abi compat plan has long since fallen by the wayside so libressl is not viable as a replacement for openssl. never mind that one :) so back to openssl and awaiting 3.0.5