On Jun 9, 2011 5:50 PM, "Heiko Baums" <lists@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
Am Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:36:21 -0500 schrieb C Anthony Risinger <anthony@xtfx.me>:
does this sound genius or completely insane? some insanely genius guy once said they are only separated by a fine line ...
Sounds completely insane.
ooooook ... and ... why? ) initramfs is not very big (fallback on my sys is only 13MB + 2MB kern) ) keeps the whole thing in mkinitcpio ) does not affect any current images and is even backward compat ) small chance of absolute failure (i think :-) ) only small changes to mkinitcpio, if any at all ) ... ) ... KISS BABY! ) oh yeah and ... PROFIT! im pretty sure it could be implemented as a hook (possibly 2) to the current system ... this might even be the best way. `install` hook would unpack the current image to a known location (prob `/lib/initcpio` somewhere), copy the kernel to the same place, and then add the directory to the image (after removing the old-old image if existed :-). the real `hook` would then check for one of two flags: ) kexec.flag ... kexec the old kernel with the boot.flag ) boot.flag ... chroot to "previous", run old hooks/mods/etc, exit chroot, switch_root like normal i thought it was pretty succinct ... elegant even :-) ... with some sprinkles of insanity that give it the funny but mildly enjoyable aftertaste. i don't have any free time for a couple days, but i'm *pretty* sure this could be done as a hook to the current mkinitcpio in a couple hours -- might take a whack at it this weekend, would be useful, as i've personally mucked my boot more than once, and though i can recover easily enough, i'm liking this more and more ... ... though i could very well be missing something obvious, certainly wouldn't be the first time ... surely someone out there reads this and thinks "why not?" C Anthony