Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio in [testing]

On 29 November 2010 00:08, Yaro Kasear <yaro@marupa.net> wrote:

Once again, I say PA is far from the kind of quality I'd expect from a package in [extra], and I'm surprised the Arch devs are even considering it, especially in light of the fact that there's far more stable and useful packages in [community] getting passed up.

Once again, nobody asked for opinions on PulseAudio, the software. If it does affect you directly, do report that here or the bugtracker. It was moved to [extra] for package-specific reasons, not just on a whim as you would like to think.