On 03-08-2010 16:14, Simon Stoakley wrote:
On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský<l.jirkovsky@gmail.com>:
On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski<t.powa@gmx.de> wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing, please signoff for both arches.
I already have .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer& Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org
I get following error on x86_64: (1/1) checking for file conflicts [####################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.devname exists in filesystem kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.softdep exists in filesystem
but it may be due to the experiments with kernel26-rc I did earlier today.
I get this too (on x86_64; didn't check on i686), when trying to upgrade from 2.6.34.1-1. Also, no package owns those two files, but the rest of the /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.* files are owned by kernel26 2.6.34.1-1.
I also get this, if it's safe to pacman -Sf this, wouldn't it be a good idea to put up a news item,(as i think someone suggested earlier) to stop the forum getting flodded with posts and also to let people know (it is the kernel after all). Just a thought.
I'd indeed appreciate if a news item was generated with a little more detailed explanation of how to handle with the error. Because so far I don't understand from both this and arch-dev-public's thread on the same matter.