Em janeiro 29, 2020 15:46 Krzysztof Krakowiak via arch-general escreveu:
Hi, I'm Krzysztof Krakowiak (pix3l in archlinux) and I'm new there
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65265 I'm very dissapointed by Doug Newgard (Scimmia) bug resolution, who simply closed my bug report with excuse "AUR packages are not supported", but the problem is not in the package from 'aur', but from 'community':
Please, don't personify things. There's no need for that and Scimmia didn't do that when he closed your bug report.
I've made request to re-open the the bug-report, by he simply ignored that request
Because your bug report is incorrect.
They should belong to 'discord-rpc-api' (currently in aur), and there are many packages dependant on it. Even if 'dolphin-emu' maintainer decides that dolphin-emu wil be built using internal copy of 'discord-rpc-api', there's no reason to export/package those header files, because it's for internal use only(compilation time).
You should report this upstream.
I don't get reasoning that if something is fucked up in upstream, then it should be fucked up in distro package (because of upstream...) I was active PLD distro developer (evil_core) and we always had high standards and main excuse for pour existence was to fix upstream brakage/incompetence.
We do patch and fix things that upstream doesn't or we need in order for things to work. Even while we could in theory change our dolphin-emu package it doesn't change the fact that your specific bug report is incorrect, because we don't support AUR packages. You're more than welcome to file this both upstream and again on our bug tracker, but this time, you can make your case for dolphin-emu not having those files, *independent* of your AUR package. If you want, you can even send a patch to the PKGBUILD/package doing that. Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini