1 Dec
2009
1 Dec
'09
11:10 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Arvid Picciani <aep@exys.org> wrote:
I take that as an invite to post packages to the tracker that adhere to the arch way. If this turns out to be another false promise, i will add that to the next iteration.
Assuming you meant "packages to the tracker that DON'T adhere to the arch way", then that is fine. Assuming of course it isn't just a bug report saying "package foobar doesn't adhere to the arch way". I'd hope there's be some "why" and "how to fix" parts