Hello! I have two systems here that are running the same version of Arch. They are using different window managers; system A is running awesomewm, whilst system B is running fvwm. Both have the same fonts installed, and both have very similar outputs for "env": System A: DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:path=/run/user/184135848/bus DISPLAY=:0 EDITOR=/usr/bin/vim FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35 HOME=/home/rm LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C LOGNAME=rm MAIL=/var/spool/mail/rm MOTD_SHOWN=pam PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/bin/site_perl:/usr/bin/vendor_perl:/usr/bin/core_perl:/home/rm/bin:/opt/bin PWD=/home/rm SHELL=/bin/bash SHLVL=2 SSH_AGENT_PID=806 SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-XXXXXXNocNEG/agent.782 SYSTEMD_EXEC_PID=673 TASKRC=/home/rm/git/com.github/io7m/dotfiles.taskwarrior/taskrc TERM=xterm-256color USER=rm VTE_VERSION=6602 WINDOWID=12195960 WINDOWPATH=1 XAUTHORITY=/home/rm/.Xauthority XDG_CACHE_HOME=/home/rm/var/cache XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/home/rm/etc XDG_DATA_HOME=/home/rm/local XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/184135848 XDG_SEAT=seat0 XDG_SESSION_CLASS=user XDG_SESSION_ID=1 XDG_SESSION_TYPE=tty XDG_VTNR=1 _=/usr/bin/env System B: DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:path=/run/user/128542918/bus EDITOR=/usr/bin/vim FREETYPE_PROPERTIES=truetype:interpreter-version=35 HOME=/home/rm-work LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C LOGNAME=rm-work MAIL=/var/spool/mail/rm-work MOTD_SHOWN=pam PATH=/home/rm-work/bin:/home/rm-work/.pyenv/shims:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin PWD=/home/rm-work PYENV_ROOT=/home/rm-work/.pyenv PYENV_VIRTUALENV_INIT=1 SHELL=/bin/bash SHLVL=0 TERM=xterm-256color USER=rm-work XDG_CACHE_HOME=/home/rm-work/var/cache XDG_CONFIG_HOME=/home/rm-work/etc XDG_DATA_HOME=/home/rm-work/local XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=/run/user/128542918 XDG_SESSION_CLASS=user XDG_SESSION_ID=16 XDG_SESSION_TYPE=tty _=/usr/sbin/env With both systems, I can open a text file containing the following string: ひらがな ... in both a browser (Firefox, Chromium), in mousepad, and in vim in an xfce4-terminal instance. System A will consistently render the string using the correct glyphs. System B will consistently render the string as a set of missing glyphs. Given that all of my software, fonts, and locale settings are apparently the same... What other variables could cause font rendering to consistently fail on one system and not the other? -- Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com