30 Apr
2020
30 Apr
'20
2:38 p.m.
But to tell the users to discuss this upstream is bad advice. This is a situation where a distribution should take corrective action by reverting this configuration. This would add value and remove some useless code from the kernel. No. If you want a distribution whose maintainers think it is a good think to "correct" upstream decisions, you should use not Arch.
So there isn't a single package in Arch Linux which trusted users have changed them in order to fix an issue which they thought it's better this way? If there is/was a package what is/was it and why?