-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 05/09/2014 01:22 AM, Daniel Micay wrote:
On 09/05/14 01:01 AM, Mark Lee wrote:
To all,
Don't make any of this personal. In addition, I hope the inclusion of systemd in Arch Linux has more justification than just some Arch developers are also Systemd developers. Arch may not be a democracy, but it's not supposed to be infested with cronyism either (I don't think it is). Let's all be calm and collected here and sort things out.
Regards, Mark
I never stated that it was a reason for it being included in Arch Linux.
You're misrepresenting what I said.
The context of the thread is someone promoting content including a lot of inaccurate claims and ad hominem attacks like this: "systemd's team is noticeably chauvinistic and anti-Unix" and yet making this claim:
This is not a rant against Arch or its devs and community, but against systemd; the sad facts speak for themselves.
I was countering the claim by pointing out that the group of people they are disparaging includes several Arch developers and other prominent people in the community.
To Daniel, I'm pointing out that respect for people shouldn't affect technical skepticism. People can rant against whomever they want as long as it has technical criticism (at least on this mailing list). Hence, don't make anything personal. Regards, Mark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlNsZ60ACgkQZ/Z80n6+J/a4MAD/f80apvVb66cYD/cwAC4u7mjZ g4lKktVoRiMwer4wqv4A/2+5+pf3RIGuQItDZNFaUP8wVAbTnW50iH1uvPwMt53T =kt7h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----