Guys, I have found a logic error in pacman (I think). I don't like replacing both the kernel and kernel-lts in the same 'pacman -Syu' call. So I answered 'no' when prompted to 'Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n'. However, then pacman fails to install anything because 'linux-lts and kernel26-lts are in conflict'. When I answered 'n' to Replace kernel26-lts, I expected pacman to ignore upgrading that package (and the others I said no to) but proceed forward and install the remaining updates. Should I file this as a bug? The full output is below: [07:55 archangel:/etc] # pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date xyne-any is up to date aaany is up to date aapkg is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... :: Replace kernel26-lts with core/linux-lts? [Y/n] n :: Replace kernel26-lts-headers with core/linux-lts-headers? [Y/n] n :: Replace module-init-tools with core/kmod? [Y/n] y :: Replace perl-exiftool with extra/perl-image-exiftool? [Y/n] resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... :: linux-lts and kernel26-lts are in conflict. Remove kernel26-lts? [y/N] error: unresolvable package conflicts detected error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) :: linux-lts and kernel26-lts are in conflict -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.