Dnia sobota 13 czerwiec 2009 o 11:05:13 Thomas Bächler napisał(a):
Magnus Therning schrieb:
interesting, it did not work for me. in the /etc/syslog-ng.conf there was:
group("log");
and syslog-ng ignored this setting, I changed it to:
group(19);
as specified in the man page and it works fine now.
Yes, same here. There should be a bug raised I guess. If no one beats me to it I'll raise on tonight.
It probably should. I'm confused though, it works for me with the group name (as in the default config).
Speaking about confusion - seems to work now with both options: group("log"); and group(19); funny thing is that the "group("log");" is in the default one .conf file, so the logs should have belonged to the log group but they did not - belive me - I am not mad ;-) the only proof I have is this: [waldek@wolfblade log]$ ll syslog.log* -rw-r----- 1 root log 338 2009-06-13 11:56 syslog.log -rw-r----- 1 root root 5483 2009-06-10 22:02 syslog.log.1 -rw-r----- 1 root root 1131 2009-05-30 09:44 syslog.log.2 -rw-r----- 1 root root 2493 2009-05-27 06:48 syslog.log.3 -rw-r----- 1 root root 875 2009-05-16 09:00 syslog.log.4 regards waldek