> I'm not exactly what you're looking for, from Emacs or from the mailing
> list.

>From Emacs, to have as many functionalities working as possible with the least trade-offs and the least bugs and issues as possible.

>From mailing list, to tell me what Emacs they use and if they have some specific reason to choose it over others.

> Is an archaic UI good or bad?
 
It's not an objective matter. 
I personally saw GNUStep UI to be very much appealing.  But it's not widely seen the same by other people.

> Is drag-n-drop required?

Not *Required*, of course. 
I didn't have the opportunity to try it.

> I turn off the toolbars and menubars.

I do turn off tool/menu/scroll bars all together anyway. 
I even turn off the title bar of the frame decoration.

(fossdd@pwned.life) <mailto:fossdd@pwned.life>> I used `emacs-wayland` for a while instead of Emacs, because I already use
a Wayland compositor

I installed the `emacs-wayland` as the first Emacs of my life.  Since my whole setup was pure Wayland. 
But I really need that daemon to stay awake all the time and do not crash when switching desktops, ttys, users and login/logouts.  It and many other things appear to not work, and probably will never work, with GTK toolkit of Emacs.

(aaronliu0130@gmail.com)> If you've already tried all of them, I don't know what to say. The Arch-maintained repo sounds like the stablest, and "emacs-wayland - with native compilation and PGTK enabled." sounds very appealing to me.

That's so enlightening of you, Aaron.  ;)

--
Best Regards,
Abraham
Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com