9 Aug
2012
9 Aug
'12
4:18 p.m.
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:35:04 -0400 Manolo Martínez <manolo@austrohungaro.com> wrote:
On 08/09/12 at 05:27pm, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 09.08.2012 17:12, schrieb Jonathan:
In the past I have seen ext2 saves time during boot vs ext3.Having a journal is no use since the files are rarely changed and the filesystem is mostly opened read only. The journal takes up some space. These may matter to you if you are trying to optimize boot times or disk usage.
Then use ext4 without a journal. ext2 is out of date and ext4 is superior in every aspect.
Is it safe to change an existing /boot from ext2 to ext4?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ext4
Manolo
-- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D