12 Dec
2008
12 Dec
'08
1:28 p.m.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Thomas Bächler <thomas@archlinux.org> wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12314
Just want to know what you guys think about this. The biggest concern, from a lot of people, appears to be that syslog-ng is dual licensed, so patches may get denied because they are already in the pay version.
I didn't look at rsyslogd, but I am actually happy with syslog-ng. So unless we have a REAL reason for switching (and some bitchy licensing concerns are not a real reason to me) I vote -1.
I hadn't seen that before, but I must admit, I'm intrigued... I'll be looking into rsyslog more.